Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Hyundai Kona 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Hyundai Kona) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 3 HP more power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 201 NM more than Hyundai Kona. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 47 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai Kona, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 722 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | 1804 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 421 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Kona, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`490 kg | 1`855 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`891 kg | 1`363 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 599 kg | 492 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Hyundai Kona. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |