Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Cupra Ateca 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Cupra Ateca) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 150 HP less power than Cupra Ateca, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Cupra Ateca. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Cupra Ateca, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 485 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 106 litres more trunk space than the Cupra Ateca. The Cupra Ateca may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.8 metres more than that of the Cupra Ateca, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 800 | 30 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |