Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and BMW X2 have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 30 NM more than BMW X2. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 51 litres | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm longer than the BMW X2, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1355 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 121 litres more trunk space than the BMW X2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW X2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 27 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
BMW X2 has
| |