Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs BMW X1 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and BMW X1 have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 30 NM more than BMW X1. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija, BMW X2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 8 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 86 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW X1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
BMW X1 has
| |