Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Jeep Cherokee) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 30 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 18.40 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 25 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 448 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | 1555 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`450 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |