Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 150 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 5.5 | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Karoq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1630 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 70 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The Skoda Karoq may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Karoq is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |