Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 183 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 246 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1206 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 207 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |