Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 120 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 176 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 5.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 161 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The Mazda CX-30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |