Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Kia XCeed 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 100 HP more power than Kia XCeed, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Kia XCeed. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.1 | |
|
The Kia XCeed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia XCeed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.50 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Kia XCeed, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 426 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 165 litres more trunk space than the Kia XCeed. The Kia XCeed may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 metres more than that of the Kia XCeed, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Kia XCeed has
| |