Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Jeep Compass 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Jeep Compass), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 130 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 10.90 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | 1251 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`450 kg | 2`223 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`925 kg | 1`619 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 604 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Jeep Compass. Therefore, Jeep Compass is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |