Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Cupra Ateca 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Cupra Ateca have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.4 | |
|
The Cupra Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Cupra Ateca are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.8 metres more than that of the Cupra Ateca, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |