Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Audi Q3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 150 HP more power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Audi Q3. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 5.9 | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi Q3 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Audi Q3 2019 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 13 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1280 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 61 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 31 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |