Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Jeep Compass 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 30 HP more power than Jeep Compass, but torque is 40 NM less than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 133 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 40 200 | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |