Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Audi Q3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 10 HP more power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Audi Q3. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 61 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 27 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |