Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 195 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 45 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 25 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 448 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | 1555 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`494 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |