Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Lexus NX 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 90 HP more power than Lexus NX, whereas torque is 311 NM more than Lexus NX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus NX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus NX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 26 cm shorter than the Lexus NX, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 91 litres more trunk space than the Lexus NX. The Lexus NX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres more than that of the Lexus NX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Lexus NX scores higher in safety tests. The Lexus NX scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Lexus NX has
| |