Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Hyundai Tucson 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 416 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 54 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 84 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 181 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Tucson engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Jaguar E-Pace | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 26 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 539 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1383 litres | 1860 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 52 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The Hyundai Tucson may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 477 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`315 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |