Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Hyundai Tucson 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 416 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 54 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 84 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Tucson engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Jaguar E-Pace | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 26 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 539 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1860 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 52 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The Hyundai Tucson may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`315 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 000 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |