Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 30 HP less power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.2 engine Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 38 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Pace, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 650 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 67 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The Jaguar F-Pace may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |