Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 28 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 238 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota C-HR engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 19 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 377 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 198 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |