Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 521 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 54 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The Skoda Karoq may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
| |