Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Mitsubishi ASX have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi ASX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 18 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 156 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |