Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Jeep Compass 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Compass, but torque is 130 NM more than Jeep Compass. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 17 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 117 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |