Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 90 HP less power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar E-Pace, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 659 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.16 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`420 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |