Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Hyundai ix35 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 34 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine Hyundai ix35 2013 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 17 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1436 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 16 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix35, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |