Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Hyundai ix35 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 34 HP more power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Hyundai ix35. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix35 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 17 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1436 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 16 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix35, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |