Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Dacia Duster 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 41 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Dacia Duster is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1260 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Nissan Juke | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine Dacia Duster 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Duster 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.99 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, 16 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 473 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1636 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 102 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Duster. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.9 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`844 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 21 800 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |