Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW X2. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm longer than the BMW X2, 16 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1355 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 105 litres more trunk space than the BMW X2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
BMW X2 has
| |