Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 90 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Karoq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Karoq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1630 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 54 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The Skoda Karoq may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |