Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 125 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.59 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 18 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1585 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 145 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |