Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 430 NM | 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 10 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery Sport, but torque is 10 NM more than Land Rover Discovery Sport. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
710 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery Sport engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.99 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`775 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 22 200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |