Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 20 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.85 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
| |