Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2013 - 2015
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.22.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 150 - 240 HP136 - 306 HP
Torque: 340 - 400 NM320 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 11.2 seconds6.9 - 11.2 seconds
In general, Volvo XC60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 8.75.3 - 10.7
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo XC60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.64 m
Width: 1.90 m1.89 m
Height: 1.61 m1.71 m
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 29 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1455 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60.
Gross weight: ~ 2`350 kg~ 2`401 kg
Net weight:~ 1`678 kg~ 1`827 kg
Load capacity:~ 672 kg~ 574 kg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 13 00013 200
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Volvo XC60 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv