Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2013 -
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.22.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 150 - 240 HP136 - 306 HP
Torque: 340 - 400 NM320 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 11.2 seconds6.9 - 11.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.3 - 10.7
On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.64 m
Width: 1.90 m1.89 m
Height: 1.61 m1.71 m
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 29 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1455 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`350~ 2`401
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 23 60014 800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
  • roomier boot
Volvo XC60 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv