Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
Torque: | 340 - 400 NM | 208 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.2 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 503 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 47 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 2`059 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 23 600 | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |