Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2013 -
Mazda CX-5
2015 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.22.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 150 - 240 HP150 - 192 HP
Torque: 340 - 400 NM208 - 420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 11.2 seconds7.9 - 10.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.74.6 - 7.3
On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.56 m
Width: 1.90 m1.84 m
Height: 1.61 m1.68 m
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres503 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1620 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 47 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`350~ 2`059
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 23 60013 000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
  • roomier boot
Mazda CX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv