Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 10.8 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.7 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.95 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 27 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 80 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 2`499 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 13 800 | 9000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |