Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 vs BMW X3 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X3 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 143 - 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 270 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 10.8 seconds | 5.7 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.7 | 5.1 - 9.0 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X3. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 28 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 25 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 2`315 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW X3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
BMW X3 has
| |