Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 vs Audi Q5 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi Q5 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 170 - 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 320 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 10.8 seconds | 6.5 - 9.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.7 | 6.7 - 9.3 | |
|
On average, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Audi Q5. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 27 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 2`353 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |