Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs BMW X5 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 3.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 245 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 430 NM | 400 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 10 seconds | 5.4 - 7.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 7.8 | 7.4 - 12.5 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 49 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 45 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1.5 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 2`799 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
BMW X5 has
| |