Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 300 HP | 180 - 271 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 540 NM | 234 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 11.2 seconds | 8.8 - 9.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.1 | 6.1 - 10.7 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 150 - 201 mm (5.9 - 7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 25 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 448 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | 1555 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`492 kg | ~ 2`427 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`900 kg | ~ 1`750 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 592 kg | ~ 677 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Jeep Cherokee. Therefore, Jeep Cherokee is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |