Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.2 (petrol) | |
| Jeep Cherokee is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 300 HP | 180 - 271 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 540 NM | 234 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.1 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 25 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 1401 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1383 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 810 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`492 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |