Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Volvo XC40 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC40 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC40 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid, electric) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 300 HP | 129 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 500 NM | 245 - 660 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 11.2 seconds | 4.9 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.1 | 5.0 - 7.1 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC40. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC40, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1336 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 131 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC40. The Volvo XC40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`362 | ~ 2`282 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 40 200 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |