Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Jeep Compass 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jeep Compass has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (diesel, hybrid) | 1.3 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel and hybrid engines. Jeep Compass is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 300 HP | 120 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 540 NM | 230 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 11.2 seconds | 7.3 - 10.7 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Jeep Compass. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.1 | 2.1 - 9.4 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 198 - 215 mm (7.8 - 8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | 1693 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 179 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Compass (by 310 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`492 kg | ~ 2`126 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`900 kg | ~ 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 592 kg | ~ 581 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |