Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Jeep Compass 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jeep Compass has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Compass can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Compass also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 300 HP | 120 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 500 NM | 230 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 11.2 seconds | 9.3 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.1 | 4.4 - 6.9 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Compass. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 133 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`362 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |