Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Audi Q2 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Audi Q2 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi Q2 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi Q2 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 300 HP | 116 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 500 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 11.2 seconds | 6.5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.1 | 4.4 - 5.4 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q2. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 18 cm longer than the Audi Q2, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 186 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi Q2, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`362 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q2 has
| |