Land Rover Discovery 1990 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 83 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Defender | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery is 5 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery has 915 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 1300 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 1.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Land Rover Discovery can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`720 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |