Land Rover Discovery 1990 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 57 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Defender | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is smaller. Land Rover Discovery is 36 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | 832 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | 1368 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery has 458 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 602 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`720 | 3`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |