Land Rover Discovery 2009 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Discovery engine produces 27 HP more power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Jeep Commander. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1940 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`240 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |