Land Rover Discovery 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 440 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Land Rover Discovery engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.2 | |
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Discovery consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
Land Rover Discovery is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 6 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 600 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Discovery can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`680 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 12 000 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |