Land Rover Discovery 2009 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery and Nissan Pathfinder have the same engine power, but Land Rover Discovery torque is 10 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Pathfinder engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Discovery engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is larger. Land Rover Discovery is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2091 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Land Rover Discovery can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |