Land Rover Discovery 2009 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 28 HP less power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jeep Commander. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Commander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Commander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Discovery is 5 cm longer than the Jeep Commander, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1940 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |