Land Rover Discovery 2009 vs BMW X5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 55 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Discovery is 2 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 1.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Land Rover Discovery can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
BMW X5 has
| |