Land Rover Discovery 2004 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 219 HP | 201 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 307 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Land Rover Discovery engine produces 18 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.0 | 13.2 | |
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.74 m | |
Land Rover Discovery is larger. Land Rover Discovery is 9 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 15 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 1192 litres | 978 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1192 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 978 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`230 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 7600 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |