Land Rover Discovery 2016 vs Volvo XC90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Discovery engine produces 23 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.7 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2406 litres | 1886 litres | |
| Land Rover Discovery has 357 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 520 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |